Ethereum (ETH) and Binance Coin (BNB) are two of the largest cryptocurrencies after Bitcoin, and they play key roles in the industry. Ethereum is the second-largest digital asset by market capitalization and a leading smart contract platform that powers decentralized applications (dApps), DeFi protocols, and the NFT ecosystem. BNB is the native token of the Binance exchange and the BNB Chain blockchain, and is one of the top 5 crypto assets by market cap. Initially released in 2017 as a means of paying fees on Binance, BNB has evolved into a multi-purpose token that powers the Binance Smart Chain (now BNB Chain) ecosystem. This article looks at the key differences between ETH and BNB.
Technological Differences: Consensus Mechanism, Speed and Fees
Consensus mechanism
Ethereum was based on Proof-of-Work but switched to Proof-of-Stake after The Merge in 2022. The network is protected by validators who have staked at least 32 ETH. This has boosted energy efficiency and provided validation to ETH holders via staking.
BNB Chain uses the Proof-of-Staked Authority (PoSA) algorithm, a hybrid of PoS and delegated trust. A BNB validator requires a stake of ~10,000 BNB and is in the top 21 by stake. As such, BNB Chain relies on a limited set of validators (21 nodes) and is more centralized, while Ethereum has hundreds of thousands of validators worldwide.
Speed and scalability
With fewer validators, BNB Chain achieves higher speeds: block times of ~3 seconds versus ~12 seconds on Ethereum. Ethereum's throughput without second layers is limited to ~15 transactions per second, which has historically caused network congestion. The developers engineered the BNB Smart Chain for greater scalability – on average ~40 TPS, and theoretically up to 1,500 TPS. This allows BNB to confirm transactions faster and process a wider data flow. However, high speed comes at the cost of decentralization: Ethereum remains more distributed and censorship-resistant, while BNB Chain is tightly coupled with Binance's infrastructure.
Transaction fees
Ethereum has a dynamic gas fee system. During busy periods, fees can reach tens of dollars, especially when running complex smart contracts. After developers activated EIP-1559, they burned part of the fee, which smooths out fee growth. However, using Ethereum was still expensive during peak activity. In contrast, BNB Chain is known for its extremely low fees – around $0.01 per transaction. The low fee is due to a more centralized consensus and optimized architecture of the BSC network. This makes BNB attractive to users with small transfers and projects critical to low transaction costs. Ethereum solves the scalability problem with the help of second-layer networks (Rollups) and planned sharding, but at the base layer, the BNB Chain still wins in terms of transaction speed and cost.
Token Economics: Emission, Burning, Inflation
ETH emission and supply
Unlike Bitcoin, with a limited coin count, Ethereum lacks a hard supply constraint. However, since the EIP-1559 update (August 2021) and the switch to PoS, the ETH economy has been deflationary at times of significant network stress. The base fee for each transaction is burned, reducing the circulating supply of Ethereum . Since April 2023 (after allowing the withdrawal of staked ETH), the net inflation of ETH has fluctuated around zero. With average activity, the network issues ~0.9 million ETH per year to reward validators and burns a comparable amount. As of the end of 2024, the total supply of ETH is ~120.4 million coins. When demand is high, Ethereum can become deflationary (burning more than is issued), but when the load is low, the fixed emission leads to insignificant inflation (~0.3% per year). Overall, Ethereum's ultrasonic money
mechanism is aimed at gradually reducing the supply and maintaining the value of ETH in the long term.
BNB emission and burning
Binance Coin, on the other hand, does not have a constant inflationary emission—all BNB were issued at launch (200 million). The BNB economy is deflationary: Binance systematically reduces the supply through quarterly burns. The goal is to halve the initial supply to 100 million BNB. Burning occurs in two ways: auto-burn according to a formula depending on the BNB price and network activity, and real-time burning of a portion of fees (BEP-95). For example, in October 2024, Binance conducted the 29th burn, withdrawing ~1.77 million BNB worth ~$1.07 billion from circulation. After that, the circulating supply was about 144.1 million BNB, and the remaining volume to be burned was ~43.5 million. Thus, BNB has a built-in deflationary mechanism. As the use of the Binance ecosystem grows, part of the income is directed to the buyback and destruction of tokens, maintaining their long-term deficit and potential growth in value.
Inflation and deflation
As a result of these models, ETH and BNB show different supply dynamics. Ethereum shows zero or slightly negative inflation after switching to PoS: in the two years since PoS, the total supply of ETH has decreased by about 0.02%. During quiet periods, the network may not burn the entire issue, and the supply grows slightly. When DeFi/NFT activity revives, Ethereum quickly becomes deflationary (as was the case, for example, in early 2023). Binance Coin is strictly deflationary until it reaches the 100 million threshold - no new coins are issued, and the total supply has already been reduced by ~56 million since launch. In Q3 2024, BNB had an annual deflation rate of ~4.5%, which had a positive effect on the token price. For investors, this means that the value proposition of BNB largely depends on Binance's activity (the more the exchange's profit and the load on the BNB Chain, the more tokens are burned). The value of ETH is determined by the demand for using the Ethereum network itself and is included in the balance between burning and validator rewards.
Market Dynamics: Liquidity, Volatility, Trading Volumes
Capitalization and market place
Ethereum consistently ranks second in market capitalization, significantly outpacing other altcoins. At the start of 2025, its market cap is estimated at around $245 billion. BNB, the most extensive exchange utility token, is in the top five and has a market cap of around $88 billion, about three times smaller than ETH. Thus, Ethereum's market share is much higher, reflecting its wide use and investor confidence.
Liquidity and trading volumes
ETH is one of the most liquid crypto assets: daily trading volumes of Ether reach tens of billions of dollars. At the beginning of 2025, the average daily trading volume of ETH was about $15 billion, which is second only to Bitcoin and stablecoins. BNB is traded mainly on Binance and related platforms; its 24-hour volume is estimated at $1.3 billion, which is 10-12 times lower than that of Ethereum. This difference is explained by the wider distribution of ETH - listed on most global exchanges, including American ones. BNB is absent from some platforms outside Binance due to regulatory risks.
However, BNB liquidity is also high: the token is actively traded in both spot and derivative segments, ranking 9th in volume among all cryptocurrencies. BNB, while also subject to market fluctuations, is often less volatile as its price is supported by active usage within the Binance ecosystem. However, BNB price in USD can fluctuate depending on the exchange's revenue and demand for Binance Smart Chain services.
Volatility and correlations
Both assets are volatile, but Ethereum has historically demonstrated slightly higher daily volatility (~5–6% on average) than BNB (~4–5%). The reason is that the BNB rate is partially supported by Binance's business performance – in calm periods, the token grows due to burn programs and demand on the exchange. Sharp drops are usually associated with negative news about Binance itself. Ethereum, on the other hand, is more susceptible to general market trends: it is highly correlated with Bitcoin and tech stocks.
For example, in 2022, amid the tightening of the Fed's monetary policy, ETH fell by more than 65% from its all-time high. BNB also fell significantly during the same period, but slightly less (by about 55% from the peak), which indicates the relative stability of BNB due to internal mechanisms (token burning, maintaining liquidity on Binance). However, when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Binance in June 2023, BNB collapsed by ~9% in a day to ~$275—such events introduce sudden volatility specific to BNB. In general, both ETH and BNB are characterized by a high beta coefficient in the cryptocurrency market. In an upward trend, they can demonstrate multiple growth surges and experience deep drawdowns during a bearish phase.
Conclusion
In 2025, Ethereum will likely remain a fundamental asset for long-term investors betting on the advancement of the entire blockchain sector. Its enhancements will boost throughput and lower fees, attracting more customers and projects. BNB is a more corporate case: its success is closely intertwined with Binance. If global crypto trading turnover grows, Binance will benefit, and BNB along with it (as a beneficiary of increased fee income and trust in the ecosystem). By 2025, both assets are expected to show growth (assuming a bull market): the consensus forecast for ETH is ~ +100-200% from current levels, for BNB—+50-100%. However, volatility will remain high, and investments in ETH and BNB still carry risks that are incomparable to traditional instruments.
MORE ON THE FLASH LIST
